Reevaluating Cetacean Sanctuaries: A Critical Perspective
A new publication critically examines the proposed benefits of sea pens as sanctuaries for cetaceans. Despite the appealing narrative of improved welfare, the study underscores significant concerns:
- Welfare Risks: Sea pens, though seemingly more natural, introduce stressors like fluctuating water quality, pathogens, noise pollution, which can negatively impact cetacean health.
- Lack of Empirical Support: The envisioned welfare improvements are not backed by robust evidence, making the initiative experimental at best.
- Operational Challenges: Managing these sanctuaries requires expertise and resources that may not be readily available, further risking animal welfare.
EAAM urges careful consideration before adopting an unverified solution, especially when initial attempts have failed to deliver on their promises. The welfare of cetaceans, like those from Marineland France, should not be jeopardized by uncertain and experimental approaches.
We encourage NGOs, policymakers, and welfare advocates to read this insightful publication
More from the Journal
Beauval Renunciation: Fifteen Years of Activism Leave Dolphins Without Solutions
EAAM expresses deep concern over ZooParc de Beauval's decision to abandon its project to welcome dolphins affected by the closure of French facilities.
Read article →Ministerial decision on the future of the Marineland killer whales
A science based warming ignored, with serious risks for the animals.
Read article →Progress, not prohibition: ensuring dolphin welfare, science and conservation in modern institutions
The European Association for Aquatic Mammals (EAAM) wishes to raise awareness about the risks created by the current public debate around cetaceans in modern institutions.While the…
Read article →
